South Africa's independent wine viewpoint

 
 
   
Home
News
Views & tastes
Recent releases
Foreign fling
From the coalface
Fridjhon weekly
Cathy's blog
The Widow
Open space
More about Grape
Magazine archive
Links: SA wine
Contacting us

 


Cathy's blog

Cathy van Zyl (MW)'s online journal about wine ... mostly

Click here for some background info about Cathy
 

Marking papers, tasting reserve bubbly and learning about horse sweat … 25 February 2008

My days and nights (!) have been very busy here in Bordeaux – last Tuesday the students wrote a mock theory exam and the ‘resident’ MWs are responsible for marking these and returning them before 15h00 Friday (today, as I write this) … all 53 of them.

As a result, I haven’t attended nearly as many of the lectures as I would have liked but do have a couple of things that you may find interesting.

For example, last night at the gala banquet hosted by Dourthe to round off the week long programme, we were introduced to Dourthe ‘Essence’, a dry red wine that blends select parcels of premium grapes and barrels from the company’s more than five properties spread throughout the various communes of Bordeaux, including Châteaux Belgrave (Haut-Médoc), Le Boscq (St Estephe), Teyssier and Lamarzelle Figeac (St Emillion) and La Garde (Pessac-Léognan). The brainchild of Dourthe head, Jean-Marie Chadronnier, this wine has only been made since 1999, and he gives his viticulturists-cum-winemakers free rein (and budget) in the vineyards and the cellars. The 2001 we were served was lovely, very savoury and refreshing … but with a slightly less ‘Bordeaux’ character than the single château wines that were on the table.

A few days earlier, I’d listened to yeast expert Antonio Palacios discuss the role of yeasts and enzymes during the fermentation and maturation processes to eliminate off-odours and flavours. Fascinating stuff. Antonio is from Rioja, and pointed out that he was quite perturbed by the ‘horse sweat’ people referred to when discussing Rioja wines apparently infected with Brett. He and some of the scientists at Rioja University set out to discover this element and so – and this I found quite amusing – ‘harvested’ sweat from some nearby horses, analysed it and compared it to the compounds in this so-called Brett wine. You’ll be very pleased to know that there is categorically no compound in wine that also exists in horse sweat!

I tasted, from magnum, the 1976 reserve wine from the house of Bollinger. Reserve wine, which is used during the blending process to assist the grand marques maintain their house style, is not permitted under French AC regulations to be sold, is bottled with no dosage and kept at 2 atmospheres of pressure. Bollinger keeps all its reserve wines in magnum and, for the most recent vintage, had to open – by hand – some 18 000 bottles before adding it to the cuvee. And I complain about a dozen or so when tasting for Platter. 100% pinot noir, the wine was medium gold, quite developed with hints of struck match and kerosene, but with lovely weight and acidity.

Must dash, papers to mark, enemies to make!

 

Cold but sweet 21 February 2008

It’s cold in Bordeaux, where I am one of the Masters of Wine involved in the seminar for 2nd year studentsbut who cares – it’s Bordeaux and there’s wine.

The visits organised by host Dourthe (one of the larger producers in the area) for those of us who arrived a day early included one of its properties, Château la Garde in Pessac Leognan, Château Guiraud in Sauternes and Domaine de Chevalier in Graves.

At Château Guiraud, they invited us to taste eight of the up to 24 ‘lots’ they harvest and ferment each year before blending the grand vin which is, of course, botrytised sauvignon blanc and semillon fermented in barrel for three weeks to two months before being blended and aged a further 18 to 24 months depending on the vintage.

The ‘lot’ numbers refer to the batch of grapes harvested on a particular day; we tasted lots from the 2007 vintage – sauvignon lots 11, 21 and 22; semillon lots 20, 23 and 25; and then lots 24 and 26 which were already ‘blends’ because sauvignon and semillon was ready to be picked on the same day. Then, as an extra treat, we were given the wine that the château is considering as the final blend for the 2007 en primeur campaign, and the 2006 which is n-e-a-r-l-y ready for release.

The wines were all unctuous but with a piercing, cleansing acidity that could be described as ‘vivacious’. The sauvignon lots were more upfront and showing more ‘apricot’ botrytis notes while the semillon was more textural, more mineral.

The probable final blend – 35% sauvignon/65% semillon – weighed in at 13.73% alcohol, residual sugar of 112g/l and 4.19g/l acidity. It was amazing to see how the components came together to sing a far sweeter and more elegant duet. It is lovely, and gets my thumbs up; as if they need it!

As cold as I was, I wasn’t about to turn up my nose at the tasting put together at Domaine de Chevalier. This property is probably better known for its white wines (dry sauvignon/semillon this time) and I hoped that included in the 12 wines that were promised us would be several of the older vintages.

Our first flight included a 2007 barrel sample as well as finished wines from the 2006, 2005, 2003, 2002 and 2000 vintages. I preferred the 2005, which was a mélange of tropical fruit and vanilla, saved from opulence and thrust towards elegance by a nervy acidity. Sauvignon clearly dominated the wines in their youth.

This acidity didn’t abate, as wines from the next flight showed – 1999, 1998, 1996, 1991, 1984 and 1975 – but the wines gained a waxiness and earthiness as semillon came to the fore, and honeyed bottled age characters started adding to its complexity.

Here my favourite was the 1991. This was the year of the great spring frost, and the Domaine lost 80% of its crop overnight. It showed quintessential smoky Graves aromas, and layered cinnamon and tangerine peel, and still that refreshing acid backbone remained.

The 1984, too, was superb; floral aromas and a slight oxidative hints adding to the complexity. It had just a hint of dirtiness – but we’ve all eaten a sandwich without washing our hands before, why not excuse a grand vin!

 

All quiet on the Pierce front 18 February 2008

I’ve been spending some time researching wine viruses (I have to give a presentation on the subjecte to Master of Wine students in Bordeaux this week) and re-reading about corky bark, rugose, fanleaf and so on sparked a – related – thought: ‘What ever happened to the glassy winged sharpshooter and Pierce’s Disease?’

Nearly 10 years ago, this was hyped as the biggest threat to the wine industry in North America and – as we all know – when America sneezes, the rest of the world catches a cold.

So, instead of googling for ‘wine virus impact quality’, I looked for articles on PD, and found something which looked useful but it didn’t seem to offer (quickly) a succinct summary of the status quo.

I found another that mentioned that Solano County was declared out of danger in November 2007 and, as of February 4 2008, 13 out of California's 58 counties remain on the infestation list, but nothing more useful … except the email address of the PR company responsible for disseminating information on behalf of the CDFA’s PD/GWSS Board (that’s California Department of Food & Agriculture Pierce's Disease/Glassy-Winged Sharpshooter).

I shot off a simple request ‘could you please tell me what is the "state of the nation" or "status quo" with respect to the disease at the moment? How bad is the infection? How much money is being spent on fighting it?’

Ken answered very quickly, and simply: ‘The bottom line is that you haven’t heard much about it because about $20 million a year is being spent to keep it under control with about another $4 million a year going to research hoping to find a cure or at least ways to manage it so it doesn’t wipe out vineyards.’

He also directed me to several documents he thought I should see (I probably would have found them if I wasn’t so lazy when it comes to trawling through sites):

2007 PD Research Symposium

2006 Report to Leg (apparently the 2007 report isn’t out yet; nice to know not only in South Africa …)

Both are very detailed documents, the latter highlighting among many other things, that the disease now threatens a grape crop production value of $4.14 billion and associated economic activity in excess of $45 billion. Other crop and ornamental plant resources such as almonds ($2.86 billion) and susceptible species of citrus ($1.22 billion), stone fruits ($1.13 billion), and shade trees are also at risk.

 

Exams, traffic and pinotage in Singapore
15 February 2008

Regular readers of this blog will know of Remie Law, the friend in Singapore I’ve mentioned before, but I don’t think I’ve told that he’d taken as a good omen the fact that the rat hero in the movie Ratatouille was called Remy.

Why would he do so? Well, because he (Remie Law, that is!) was nearing the end of a hotel, restaurant and general hospitality course which required him to not only have a more than passable knowledge of the relevant legislation, business practices, kitchen and restaurant design and so on, he had to prepare a dish to an exceptionally high standard.

It seemed to me to be an awfully big challenge to take on when one has a wife, two children, is running a wine consultancy and is involved in wine education but Remie was undaunted. And his belief in the Remie-Remy connection has just been vindicated

I received an email from him yesterday saying:

My cooking practical exam is over and the examiner loved my dish. Both he and my principal lecturer really tucked in. I’m thrilled because I didn’t exactly get off to a good start.  

See, I had packed my equipment and uniform before the weekend but decided to leave my chef's jacket to hang in to closet so that it would not be crumbled in the knapsack; a smart uniform adds marks to your score.

This morning at the examination venue at about 8:40am I started to dress for the exam, which was due to start at 9:20am. Lo, and behold! I realised I had left my jacket hanging in the closet. My dear Bibi and Daryl [that’s Remie’s wife, a teacher who is herself studying for a higher diploma, and son] hopped in a taxi to deliver it to me, right in the middle of the city. Only in a major city like Singapore could one travel 8.5km in 30 minutes during peak period traffic.

I started my prep about 10 minutes late with my hands still quivering with the adrenaline rush. But the dish, when I finally delivered it for assessment was, as Gordon Ramsay would say, ‘Spot on.’

The good news kept on coming: when I went to collect my theory exam results, I was told I’d scored the only distinction for both full-time and part-time students.

Then, sans lunch, I rushed to the Nanyang Techological University to do my part for wine education in Singapore. They were holding the 1st wine exhibition ever for a tertiary institute, and I was to lead a ‘wine tour’ through the booths of the 12 participating merchants.

The only South African wine we came across was a Hartenberg Pinotage 2003, which was still drinking well in a middle-aged kind of way. Not racy, but a comfort wine, perhaps with some Char Koay Teow (fried flat rice noodles with oodles of sweet black soya sauce, bean sprouts, egg and Chinese sausages).

Sounds good to me. And I’m certain that if anyone were to go to Singapore with a bottle, Remie’d be happy to share it with them, and provide the dish.

 

Talking of –  and tasting – slate 11 February 2008

It’s difficult for me – sitting here at my laptop – to think of something to write about the ‘Slate’ tastings organised by Jörg Pfützner. (You may recall that he’d chosen the title because the wines he’s selected come from the schist of the Duoro, Priorat and Germany’s Mosel.) But write about it I should because the day-long ‘workshop’ he’d arranged for some media and retail people was one of the best I’ve attended recently – and the grand wine-and-food fests he held in top Johnanesburg and Cape Town restaurants were reportedly also great occasions (sadly I had to miss them).

It’s difficult partly there was so much, partly because there were so many other journalists in the room, who might have beaten me to the keyboard. I tried so hard to begin my blog first thing today but real life got in the way and last night – well, I got home at seven in the evening after having left the house at ten in the morning; it was a long adventure and I owed the family a piece of me.

Leading Mosel maker of great riesling, Ernie Loosen (of Dr Loosen fame), introduced his presentation as ‘The Rocky Horror Riesling Show’ (the influence of slate rock was, after all, the focus) and it was this informality that set the tone for the nearly two hours we listened to him talk about his vineyards and his wines while we sipped them. You might enjoy these two quotes he uttered, the one under his breath and the other quite forcibly (you guess which):

‘Any of my wines that retail for under $30 in the USA will be bottled under screw cap. Customers shelling out more than $30 don’t want screwcaps, they want cork, so they’ll get it. I don’t want to force the customer, after all he still has to pay me.’

‘High alcohol content completely destroys the delicacy of slate. Our fruity wines will therefore only reach 7-8% alcohol and our dry wines 11.5%.’

By contrast, Dirk van der Niepoort (of the famous Niepoort port house, now almost as well known for the dry wines he makes in Portugal’s Douro valley) was quite reticent. When I arrived at the venue and found him in the kitchen with a large pot of crayfish he had just steamed and de-tailed and asked if I could help him take out all the leg meat, he replied ‘If you wish,” and shrugged his shoulders, moving on to his next task (he wouldn’t even turn for a photograph).

Later on, he admitted to being nervous sharing a kitchen with Aubergine restaurant’s Harald Bresselschmidt. He needn’t have been: his contribution to lunch – poached hake on a petit pois puree and cucumber salad, and crayfish risotto – were superb.

Talking about his wines, a different Dirk emerged, one that was charming but forthright. How’s this:

‘I don’t believe in varieties, so can’t give you the exact proportions of all of those that are in my wines.’ [He could have added that we probably wouldn't have heard of any of the 13 or so indigenous Portuguese varieties in one of his white wines.]

‘Fruit is not important to me but freshness is; I insist my wines have a lot of freshness. Schist soils make more elegant, fresher wines; granite soils make fatter, more rounded wines.’

Oh, there was much, much more to this tasting. It was a treat. So watch out for those reviews that are bound to start appearing.

 

Alternative to Eskom?
8 February 2008

After reading the Widow describe Mont Destin’s Valentine’s offer of a pinotage and water bath in the vineyards to celebrate Valentine’s Day, I thought there was nothing left for those in the wine industry to do to cause my jaw to hang open with disbelief.

But wait (in the words of those dreadful infomercials), there’s more! It’s the pachyderm press. Ask Boplaas.

The press is called Harry, and he’s a 22 year-old resident of the Knysna Elephant Park. It took just three weeks for staff there to train him to tread grapes. During the treading process – his feet were washed and sterilised beforehand – Harry snacked on chardonnay, pinotage and cabernet sauvignon grapes, his favourites. It stands to reason then that the rosé will blend these two red varieties.

Powerful, manoeuvrable and Eskom-independent, this press was used – for the first time, claims Boplaas’s Rozanne Nel, to press grapes for an Elephant Rosé 2008 and Elephant Chardonnay 2008. These will be sold in selected restaurants and wine shops, and the proceeds donated towards elephant research projects and conservation. 

Go figure!

 

 

H$w m$ch b$tt$r?
5 February 2008

There I was, peddling away on the exercise bike at Virgin Active, training for The Pick ‘n Pay Argus Cycle Tour in much the same way as John Maytham and so many others who don’t enjoy cycling into the teeth of the South Easter are, when I came across that age old wine question: Do you get better wine if you spend more?

Actually, I was re-reading a book I’d first read about five years earlier (I get so bored on the bike, but nothing will induce me to brave winds that endeavour to push me backwards up a hill I’m trying to cycle down). It’s called You heard it through the grapevine: Shattering myths about the wine business by Stuart Walton.

Walton asks (and answers) several questions, using Domaine Romanée-Conti, good sauternes, champagne, the Super-Tuscans, and wines from Torres to make his points:

• Do the winemakers literally just charge what they think the wines taste as if they are worth?

• Or are there genuine economic factors at work in their creation?

• Do you get better wine if you spend more money; or is it just another kind of label snobbery, on a par with the designer clothes industry?

Incidentally, he thinks DRC is ‘rather good’, just not ₤650-good (bearing in mind the book was published in 2001); good Sauternes worth the ‘ridiculous’ prices asked for it given its labour-intensiveness; champagne over-priced despite its mechanisation (which replaced its labour-intensiveness); the Super-Tuscans revolutionary next to even supposedly superior Chianti Classico; and Torres Grans Muralles, on the evidence of the 1996 vintage, ‘not worth anything like its asking price’.

I guess I agree with him in every respect, with the exception of his pronouncement on the Grans Muralles. I’ve tasted different vintages about five (yes, a whole five) times now, and I reckon it’s one wine I’d buy for my cellar when I win the Lotto.

The reason I wanted to re-read Walton’s arguments was I’d just received an offer from Cambridge-based Noel Young Wines to buy from their ‘typically miniscule yet highly desirable’ allocation of Larry Turley's 2005 Zinfandel.

The wines come from grapes from some of California's oldest, head-pruned, dry-farmed and organic vineyards. Yields are very low and grapes picked very late (I tried not to remember my prejudice about Californian hang-time), the wine is aged for 14-16 months in 75% French and 25% American oak barrels (25% new) before being bottled unfined and unfiltered.

The under-bond case prices were pretty reasonable; about £239 for a case of one of the single vineyard bottlings. If I were a zin fan, I could just about go for that; the wine is a lovely example of the variety. But, add transport, duty and VAT, and it nudges over the R500 a bottle mark and not desirable enough.

PS: Pinotage champion, UK-based Peter May, wrote to say he’d spotted more South African wine at a lower alcohol level than expected … and lower than many a German wine (LINK TO BLOG). In Morrisons, a supermarket, he spotted a First Cape Café Collection Chenin Blanc 2007 boasting a 9% alcohol (and costing £4.79; or just less than R60). Go figure.

 

Turning down the heat  1 February 2008

The drone of a heavy-duty helicopter woke us this morning. ‘Fire on the Helderberg!’ screeched Luke joyfully and rushed outside to catch a glimpse of the bright orange bucket that holds the water which is so often the only hope of wine growers desperate to keep the flames from their vineyards.

I had a beautiful view of the site of the fire 40 minutes later after dropping him at school; a journey which included a detour past the reservoir in the Helderberg Nature Reserve where these flying fire-fighters fill up. It seemed to be in the bluegum plantation just above Spanish Farm, one of Somerset West’s most exclusive suburbs. That meant that no vineyards were in immediate danger but if the southeaster were to rise (as it threatens to do as I write this; there’s a determined breeze tickling the tree tops outside my window), the situation could change in an instant.

Chatting to Boekenhoutskloof’s Marc Kent about something else earlier in the morning, he mentioned he’d been wide awake at four o’clock on Saturday morning. Not because his twins had disturbed his sleep, but rather a fire on the property. Marc’s a bit of an old hand at battling the flames, with the help of the Franschhoek Fire Brigade, of course; he’s had several on the property in a handful of years.

Fire, too, was just one of the many personal and business-related hurdles that have beset the Kröne family of Twee Jonge Gezellen over the past decade. Yet, like others in the industry, they refused to let it snuff out their love for their farm and way of life.

I was reminded of their collective fortitude when I was surprised with a drive to Tulbagh and one of their Night Harvest Dinners. It’s a Krone family – complete with dogs – affair: youngest son Luke is the host ensuring the dinner and programme of events runs smoothly; dad and bubbly specialist Nicky leads the bottle maturation cellar tour; Mary, dubbed ‘matriarch’ by Nicky, explains the range of specialist MCC wines they’re bringing to the market; and Matthew (older than Luke but no less good looking) takes charge of the trip into the vineyards.

Harvesting at night serves a dual purpose, explains Nicky. Because the grapes are cooler to start off with and don’t have to be transported in the baking sun where they’d get even hotter, they more quickly reach optimum fermentation temperatures. This streamlines the cellar routine and benefits wine quality.

Just as importantly for him, the harvesters prefer working in the cool of the night; it’s less physically taxing and they’re more efficient, picking – and therefore earning – almost double the amount they used to harvest during the day.

I don’t know about you, but I struggle to work in an office when the mercury rises above 34°C; I hate to think how I’d fare out in the vineyards of the Boland where 40°C has been the norm for the past few days. Perhaps Twee Jonge Gezellen makes a good labour practice point, as well as great fizz!

 

Showing off Spain 29 January 2008

I get a little anxious when I’m conducting a tasting at which the wines I’ve chosen are intended to demonstrate a certain point, or points. Like, for example, attempting to highlight to Cape Wine Academy students the differences and similarities between rieslings from Germany, Austria, Alsace and Australia and South Africa. Or hoping to convey the Old World charm of Italy to my wine tasting club. Or even just trying to convince cycling-cum-avid bubbly sipper-cum-gossip buddy, Shirley Williams, that the high price of a French sparkler is well worth it. (Actually, I think Martin Meinart did just that with a 1998 Billecart-Salmon Cuveé Elizabeth Salmon last weekend – aee the previous blog entry.)

Sometimes – like dogs and babies – wines refuse to behave according to their stereotype, or label. The riesling from Alsace will prove far more robust than those from Austria and Australia, the Chianti will attempt to masquerade as an ultra ripe pinot noir, and the champagne will just not, well, not fizz.

Fortunately, this didn’t happen earlier this week at the tasting at which I’d included wines from two of the producers I visited in Spain last year – Finca Antigua (owned by well-known Rioja producers, Martinez Bujanda) and the Màrqués de Griñon’s Dominio de Valdepusa.

I’d selected them for three reasons – both believe petit verdot has a role to play in the future wine fortunes of the Meseta and I had sourced single bottlings of this grape from both producers; the Màrqués had been the driving force behind new wine legislation resulting in the introduction in 2000 of a new quality category, Denominación de Origen de Pago or Denominación de Origen de Pago Calificada, by the regional government of Castilla-La Mancha in 2000 and I wanted to determine if those attending the tasting agreed with the decision; and the Martinez Bujanda family had elected to invest in La Mancha ahead of upcoming regions of Toro, Somontano and Cigales because they believe this area is Spain’s ‘New World’.

The Finca Antigua wines acquitted themselves well. Two that we tasted sold for only €3 from the cellar and would certainly meet any supermarket buyer’s requirement for supple tannins and luscious fruit. Its flagship, Claus, which is priced at around €15 ex-cellar, was also very New World in character with bold fruit and oak flavours, but was certainly several steps up the quality ladder and worth the price.

The Màrqués de Griñon’s wines – we tasted three: the petit verdot, the syrah and the Bordeaux blend called Summa – were very classy. Tasted alongside other producers from Méntrida, they certainly earn their lofty status; tasted alongside Spain’s ‘first growth’ line-up (which we didn’t do but we did have wines from Ribera del Duero and Priorat), I’m not so sure.

And the petit verdots? That from Finca Antigua was juicy and amenable, I can see them buying it now in Asda, Tesco and other Brit supermarkets, and enjoying it immensely. That from the Màrqués de Griñon was stylish, with polished tannins and more classic fruit profile. ‘Boy, I’d love to have this wine in my cellar as a blending partner,’ quipped one of the tasters. ‘But it just doesn’t do it for me as a single variety. That’s my prejudice coming through.’

Prejudice aside, I think I’ll call this one a success, and the wines well behaved.

 

Challenging the stereotypes 23 January 2008

The wine in your glass is pleasant enough – it has a neutral nose with some floral and green apple hints, not much flavour, not much texture but it’s dry and has a fair whack of alcohol (14% you’ll discover when shown the label). What is it?

Over-cropped chardonnay or chenin blanc from Chile or South Africa? Mass produced trebbiano from Italy, or airén or viura from Spain? Badly-sited verdelho in Australia, or America? Aligoté from Burgundy?

If I was a betting person, I’d be prepared to bet the best bottle of claret in my cellar that you’d mention these – in addition to numerous others – before turning to silvaner from Germany, which is what it was.

I tasted the wine courtesy of winemaker Martin Meinert in Langebaan this weekend, where we and our families were both guests of cycling-cum-avid bubbly sipper-cum-gossip buddy, Shirley Williams, and her steak-aficionado husband Gerald. Martin had been sent a mixed case of wine by a few German visitors he’d hosted during the course of last year.

This wine (I wish I could find the piece of paper on which I made a note of the name; it was a good party) was bottled in the traditional bocksbeutel of the Franken region (the bottle shape better known here as the claimed but disputed property of Distell for their Graça), where it was made. Franken is, according to authors Oz Clarke and Margaret Rand in Grapes and Wines, home to the best site for silvaner, the Stein vineyard on a steep slope on the edge of the city of Würzburg.

They also suggest that, in Germany, silvaner’s wines are dry and gently earthy, never aromatic; in Alsace, they are smokier and spicier with greater breadth; in Italy’s Alto Adige, fairly bright and acidic; and in Switzerland, the best can be honeyed and mineral.

In South Africa, there’s just the one varietal bottling, that by Overgaauw. I haven’t tasted it for quite some time but German-born sommelier Jörg Pfützner did the honours for Platter’s* 2008 edition. He found it showed some individuality with hints of melon and spice. At 13.5% alcohol, it was a touch more restrained than my Franken sipper.

Now there’s something I wouldn’t wager my Bordeaux on; finding a South Africa wine lower in alcohol than a German one. During the previous week I shared in a few bottles of a delicious, beautifully balanced Wehlener Sonnenuhr Spaetlese 2001 from J J Prum: 8% alcohol it declared on the label. Though locally there was last year, of course, Jean-Vincent Ridon’s magnificent Signal Hill Eszencia which, at all of 5.1% alcohol. didn’t even offocially qualify as a wine…

* Declaration of interest: In case you don’t remember, I’m a member of the Platter tasting team.

 

Putting in extra time 18 January 2008

I had to giggle when a winemaking friend with a sweet tooth (he’d better stay nameless) expressed his dismay at the fact that he entered 2008 with – for the first time since he started losing weight a few years back – a triple digit score on his bathroom scale. He’s now wearing trainers, he says, because they make him look taller (and therefore slimmer) and give him the feeling that he can break into a jog at any time and banish those extra kilos from his waistline.

Of course, I was giggling in sympathy because – while my scale shows I weigh exactly what I did this time last year – I know that what I have to lose to take myself back to a pre-Luke figure (yes, I know he is 10 years old and I should have won this battle ages ago).

So, it was with great determination that I climbed on the exercise bike at gym last week, and added an extra 10 minutes to my normal routine all because I’d helped finish a bottle of madeira (apart from everything else) the night before.

The wine, arguably the most long-lived of all, is only made on the volcanic island of the same name. This belongs to Portugal but is closer to Africa, and is very rugged so that viticulture here is challenging to say the least. Not only do grape growers have to contend with steeply terraced vineyards, the damp, sub-tropical climate mean that fungal diseases are a constant, not a variable.

One of the winemaking steps that distinguishes madeira from other styles of fortified wine is that it is ‘cooked’ after fermentation. This estufagem process mimics the maturation process that wines from the island used to undergo in the 17th century in the bowels of the ships in which they were transported across the tropics to far-flung markets.

Madeira is a complicated wine, classified according to the grape, the residual sugar in the wine and its age. One of its consistent characteristics is high acidity so that even those wines with high residual sugars taste lively and refreshing.

The wine I was privileged to drink (a 1977 vintage from D’Oliviera) was not made from the most widely used varieties of the varietally named wines – Sercial, Verdelho, Bual and Malvasia  in increading order of sweetness – but from terrantez, a grape that is regarded by the Madeira Wine Institute as noble. In style it usually comes between Verdelho and Bual. It was almost extinct a few years ago, but is slowly making a come-back.

Often, madeira defies description, because so much of its charm is the extraordinary complexity the grape and winemaking process give to the nose, and the ethereal palate balance it can achieve.

Suffice it to say, I’d be more than willing to sweat it out for an extra hour a day if my Fairy Godmother waved her magic wand and turned all the wine in my cellar to good quality madeira!

 

What a difference a zero makes 17January 2008

We were sitting in the back row at a tasting organised by Waterford’s Francois Haasbroek (which Tim James says he's going to report on more fully ... soon), and somehow we’d started talking about canopy management. I said I vaguely recalled that the outside leaf in the canopy would absorb about 60 percent or more of the sunlight shining down on the vine, the second about 35 percent and the inner leaves would therefore receive less than 10 percent of the available sunlight; sommelier Jörg Pfützner maintained that he’d read the outer leaf absorbed all but 10 percent of the sunlight. We agreed to disagree – and said we’d check our sources.

Of course, Jörg being Jörg and being German, he checked before I did, and left a message directing me to Jancis Robinson’s The Oxford Companion to Wine which states ‘… say a leaf facing the sun at midday receives 100 relative units of sunlight. The second leaf in the canopy will receive less than 10 of those units and the third will receive less than one.’ There’s Jörg’s 10 percent.

I checked Sunlight into Wine (by Richard Smart and Mike Robinson – no relation but Jancis did write the foreword) and here it was stated that ‘a leaf in bright sunlight (say 2 000 micro Einsteins per square meter per second) will only transmit about 6%, so 120 micro Einsteins per square meter per second pass through to the next leaf in the canopy, the third leaf in line would receive only 7 micro Einsteins per square meter per second and would be in deep shade. This simple example ignores reflection of light between leaf layers.’

Believe it or not, I also went back to the essay plans I’d prepared while studying, and found one on the topic ‘Discuss the relationship between canopy management and fruit maturity’. Page 2 of the plan included this note: ‘a leaf in bright sunlight (2 000 micro Einsteins per square meter per second) transmits only 6% to the next leaf in the canopy … or the bunch!’

Hell, so in just five years, I’ve lost a zero! I don’t mind being wrong, because it gives me reason (and desire) to brush up on those important topics that we all lose touch with because we don’t deal with them on a daily basis. Of course, I could just keep quiet and listen to Jörg.

Sunlight is, of course, critical for the vine’s survival; photosynthesis (the process which uses the sun’s energy to convert carbon dioxide to the sugars the vine uses as building blocks to manufacture its chemical compounds such as proteins, carbohydrates and phenols) is dependent on sunlight. No photosynthesis occurs below 30 micro Einsteins per square metre per second (1.5 percent) and reaches its optimum rate at about 700 micro Einsteins per square metre per second (about 30 percent of full sunlight).

But, leaf temperature also affects photosynthesis with maximum rates between 20 to 30°C, and no photosynthesis below 10°C or above 35°C. And so, too, does wind speed, and water availability, and …

Back to the companiable Oxford. I’ll leave 'Jancis' next to my bed. Maybe that will help turn reason and desire into action.

 

Petit verdot – the ‘hot’ alternative 11 January 2008

Sweltering in my office, mindful of the fact that Al Gore had been one of Time magazine’s ‘People of the Year’ finalists for his efforts to draw the globe’s attention to global warming, I was reading through the notes I’d prepared last year for a tasting I’m due to give sometime this month or next, depending on the harvest demands inflicted on the winemakers in our group.

Not only did I need to create a few slides to illustrate the points I wanted to make, I wanted to check what I’d written about my decision to include petit verdot … in a tasting of Spanish wines.

One of the classic five red varieties in Bordeaux – along with cabernets sauvignon and franc, merlot and malbec – petit verdot is valued for its colour, structure and floral (violets) scent. However, its plantings in Bordeaux are limited because it ripens so late there and fruit quality can therefore be severely compromised by late autumn rains and frosts.

Of course, this characteristic would not pose as much of a problem in warmer climates and the grape has found a home (a small cottage if not a lavish villa) in Tuscany, and parts of Spain, Chile, the USA and Australia. Of course, here in South African, we know about the grape, in fact we have some 557 hectares of it according to the 2006/7 SA Wine Industry Directory, but it appears no-one is shouting its praises, except as a seasoning in wines is our blends, which is not necessarily a bad thing. Oh, about a dozen producers bottle petit verdot as a single variety.

By contrast, two of the producers I visited in Spain last year – Finca Antigua (owned by well-known Rioja producers, Martinez Bujanda) and the Màrqués de Griñon’ Dominio de Valdepusa – were very enthusiastic about the variety claiming its role in their blends, as well as single variety bottlings, will become increasingly important as temperatures rise courtesy of our collective refusal to educe carbon emissions et al.

Both producers are located on the Meseta, Spain’s high central plain, where cencibel (tempranillo) and garnacha have historically led the red wine race. Generally speaking, the wines here were not among the best Spain had to offer but this is changing: in his book, The New Spain, John Radford credits this area as being ‘the powerhouse of Spain filling the supermarket shelves of Europe with excellent-quality, value-for-money wines’.

Supermarkets are not exactly the Màrqués’ or the Martinez Bujanda’s target market; there’re more intent on establishing footholds in specialist wine stores and restaurants. Both do, however, like fruit-driven wines and regard their homes on the Meseta as Spain’s equivalent to the New World.  And, they both firmly believe the late ripening petit verdot will be a star performer in their line-up.

I’ll let you know what we think after our tasting.

By the way, in his Time interview, Mr Gore claims to ‘have failed’ so far in his quest and says he will only regard himself as successful when the world mobilises – as a country mobilises for war – against global warming. Roll on the day.

 

Wet, wet, wet – simple musings 7 January 2008

It’s been – thankfully or I may not have been able to drag myself into the office for my first day back at work – a wet, wet, wet day in Somerset West. Our annual holiday (yes, I’m claiming the trips I did to Spain and Australia last year as work, not relaxation) was a decadent 25 days of nothing but sun and sea ... and family … just 45 minutes away in Pringle Bay.

I have to admit it was a faitly non-vinous period, especially in terms of foreign wines, and it broke my Barolo-Rioja-Burgundy heart to respond to friend Hew’s email listing the wines he’d had with Christmas dinner (Ch. Pichon Baron 1982 followed by Ch. D’Yquem 1967, followed by Ch d’Yquem 1986) and on New Year’s Day (CVNE Imperial Gran Reserva 1968). My response was: ‘beer’. Of course, he had to ask the vintage! Hmmm, I think it was Heineken November 2007.…

Foreign wines or no foreign wines, we did imbibe a fair amount catching up with old friends, like Marian Shinn and Charlie Ward at the annual catch-up lunch thrown by Paul and Di Perton over the bay in Rooi Els. Marian does PR for The Winery of Good Hope and proudly informed us all that its Chenin Blanc 2006 scored 90 out of 100 points on the US magazine Wine Enthusiast’s Top 100 Best Buys of 2007 to earn position number 8 on the list, the only South African wine to make it into the top 10.

Wines selling at $15 or less and scoring 85 points or higher out of 100 are eligible for selection for this best-buy list; it retails at about R34 in South Africa. The other South African wines to make it into the top 50 were Sebeka 2006 Shiraz-Pinotage (the new wine made for US giant Gallo by Swartland; No 15 with 88 points) and Beau Joubert 2005 Oak Lane Merlot-Cabernet Sauvignon (No 49 with 87 points).

She and I also giggled a little at the way wineries use their competition triumphs to catch the consumer’s eye. There’s nothing wrong with wearing your medals, of course, but some just seem to take it a bit too far, even mimicking the ‘bling’ to attract attention – as the photograph she emailed me to illustrate her point proves.

Phil and I did, too, eat a little too well and a little too much (I blame our guests and am off to the gym just as soon as I finish this posting) and so are looking forward to some simple fare. But how’s this for a great idea for us who like to cook – a professionally equipped kitchen and private dining room so that you can ‘chef’ for your own party of up to 24 people. It certainly would make a change from the two gas burners (no oven) we had to contend with on Christmas Day preparing a hot celebratory meal for 15 people.

Problem is, the venue is in Singapore; I noticed it when I read my friend Remie’s newsletter sent out to over 1 000 subscribers to drive them to his site, www.happywines.com. In the letter, Remie also bemoans the fact that food, venue, attire appear to be more important than wine when it comes to weddings in Singapore these days. He writes:

Wine appears to be just an afterthought in the wedding budget. In years past, serving the best available alcoholic drink, a XO Cognac for example, was mandatory to send off the newly-wedded couple. Today, even VSOP has no place in a classy banquet. And the tide, too, has turned for wine with too many wedding banquets featuring wines that are the equivalent of 3-star brandy or worse.

Think about it … tax on a 750 ml bottle of wine is about $8.00. If you serve your 10 guests to a table, a bottle costing $18.00, you are actually serving them wine costing only $10. Thus, each guest toasts to your future happiness with a glass of wine worth just $1. Hey, even a can of Coke costs more than that!”

Gulp! editor and Wine magazine deputy, Christian Eedes, gets married in February. I’m certain he’ll need no encouragement to take Remie’s point to heart.

May 2008 be filled with good fortune for our industry, its workers and its owners. I hope it’s a prosperous and peaceful one for you all.

 

Talking Côte Rôtie 17 December 2007

Talking about Côte Rôtie, when last did you confuse the northern Rhône wine with one from Bordeaux? It would not be that hard to do if (1) most of the wines in the line up were old-ish, (2) there was no real claret in the line up to show up the characteristics of both regions, and (3) particularly if your host pointed revealed that the only clue about the 10 wines in front of you was that three of them were Parker 100 point achievers.

‘Parker’ and ‘Bordeaux’ seem a natural pairing, like Sauternes and foie gras, tuna and wasabi, salty pistachios and fine fino. But, too many of us forget – or forgot on this occasion – that Bob also rates Burgundy, Italy, California, Spain, Australia, sometimes some South Africa, and always the Rhône.

Syrah fanatic (now there’s another clue) Marc Kent was the host throwing the cat amongst the pigeons (or the red herring amongst the … now, where would you throw a red herring?) at one of the tasting groups to which we both belong. About half of his guests took his bait, nominating the line up as Bordeaux. Another third suggested that only one of the flights was Bordeaux, the remainder Rhône. Fortunately, there was a handful of us who put 4 plus 3 plus 3 together and decided to back the home of syrah – colour and bouquet aside, the tannin structure just didn’t fit claret.

In fact, all of the wines came from the northern Rhône: there were four from Cornas, three from Côte Rôtie and three from Hermitage. Among other things, it was interesting to note how rustic the Cornas wines appeared alongside those from the Côte Rôtie and Hermitage, and how modern several of the 2001 wines were compared to those harvested more than 15 years ago. Aside from being a seriously delicious treat, this was an intriguing mental exercise, something I love.

The tasting was a week ago, and I’m still mulling it over in my mind. Of course, my memory is fuelled by the three Parker 100 pointers – Guigal’s La Mouline 1991, Chapoutier’s Le Pavillon 1990 and Jaboulet’s La Chapelle 1990 – sipped with the superb celebratory meal we enjoyed afterwards. A ‘retro’ feast (Avocado Ritz, duck with cherries and mince pies were the inspiration), this was prepared with typical flair and numerous twists and takes by Reuben Riffel to say ‘goodbye’ to a frenetic year and ‘hello’ to what we hope will be a peaceful and prosperous one for all.

May all your end of year wine experiences be memorable – although I promise you, you’ll have to go far to top Marc’s epic. Happy holidays!

 

Of rats and wine in the movies 12 December 2007

Luke and I went to see Ratatouille on Saturday, the latest animated masterpiece (if you enjoy animation) from Disney’s Pixar Studios. The movie stars Remy, a young rat with a passion for food who arrives in Paris and makes an unusual alliance with a restaurant's new garbage boy. This young man, Linguini, then becomes a rising star in the culinary world thanks to Remy’s skill at directing him in the kitchen.

Of course, there’s more of the usual – like love, betrayal, theft, death threats, flying knives and raging fires, etc – but while the antics of the rat and human populations interested Luke, I was fascinated by the all-powerful restaurant critic, named Anton Ego and impressively ‘voiced’ by Peter O’Toole.

Unfortunately for me, Ego made only a view brief appearances but there was always a bottle of wine in his scenes. I was intrigued by which wines the American storytellers would have him drink, given that the film is set in that country which wouldn’t believe in weapons of mass destruction. I’m happy to report that I saw only French labels, of which I managed to scribble down – in the pitch black of the movie theatre – the names of only two.

When I visited the Internet Movie Database to see if the wines were mentioned, under ‘trivia’ I found a whole bunch of interesting things, several of which suggest that critics aren’t the only souls only on this planet with giant egos:

bullet

Every PIXAR film has had a reference to room A-113 from the California Institute of the Arts. A number of animators began their CalArts career in this room. A-113 appears on a little tag clipped to the ear of a rat named Git.

bullet

The brand of motorcycle that chef-cum-love-interest Collett rides is Calahan — a reference to director of photography and lighting director Sharon Calahan.

bullet

The French waiter in the trailer talking about the cheeses is voiced by the film's director, Brad Bird. During a street scene, there is a mime in the background, a character from The Incredibles, also directed by Brad Bird. And, when deciding where Remy should control Linguini, Linguini pulls open his trousers exposing his underwear, boxers with an The Incredibles logo pattern.

bullet

Nearly every Pixar film shows the Pizza Planet Truck from Toy Story. The truck appears on the bridge over the Seine on the scene during one of the movie’s many chase scenes.

But back to the wines: they were – I hope, because I only saw them for a split second – a 1961 Chateau Latour and a 1947 Cheval Blanc. The third was a Côte Rôtie, but it was shown side on and so I couldn’t see the producer or the year, but I bet it was superb. Ego has great taste.

 

 

An alternative to sulphur? 10 December 2007

Much as I love the world of wine, I have to admit that – as with most industries – several of its production practices can be wasteful (have you ever asked a winemaker what his ‘litres of water used: litres of wine produced’ ratio is?) and others harmful (think pesticides, herbicides, fungicides, and so on). Just a day or so back, the Cape Times printed a letter from Vanessa Turner in Stellenbosch, who claims her fatigue, headaches and itchy eyes are related to the spraying regime wine growers employ to protect the health of their future crop.

And even those who live far away from the wine growing regions are not safe; those at least who are allergic to the preservative of choice – sulphur dioxide. But, if Guy Kebble has his way as explained to wineloving presenter John Maytham on Cape Talk radio, winemakers will throw out the sulphur in favour of something called UV irradiation.

This brother of Brett (‘Kebble, not Anomyces’ quipped Meerlust winemaker Chris Williams when I asked him if he’d come across the technology before) is involved in a company called Surepure which claims to have ‘successfully developed a system using UV irradiation technology to preserve the natural goodness and reduce the micro-organisms within clear and turbid liquids’, to quote the web site. Surepure claims the process is effective for dairy products (milk, brine, whey and liquid eggs), fruit juices and concentrates, purification of water … and beer and wine.

I don’t pretend to understand fully how it works (at least not after spending only five minutes on the website) but this, to me seems to be the crucial sentence:

UV radiation damages the DNA of exposed cells by causing thymine dimer (peptide bonds) formation in the pathogens DNA molecules. These wavelengths are absorbed by the DNA of micro-organisms causing them to become inactive and harmless to consumers.

Chris puts it more succinctly:

UV sterilisation is used in dairy production to replace pasteurisation, but essentially it does the same thing – that is, inhibits micro-organisms by denaturing the proteins in their DNA and RNA.

So, on the face of it, this appears a valid alternative to sulphur dioxide. But, as Chris points out, ultraviolet light may kill organisms, but it cannot replace the anti-oxidant function of SO2. He adds that UV light also changes the phenolic structure of wines and can denature certain proteins, enzymes and other components of the wine, which are essential for making it what it is. That is why most wine – and good olive oil – is sold in tinted bottles, to screen out UV light.

Chris says he’ll investigate this option further, but I suspect it’ll take a while and a lot of convincing to change our winemakers’ minds about SO2 and embrace an alternative, be it the Surepure technology or not. Until then, those of us who might imbibe a little more than we should from time to time can safely claim a ‘sulphur allergy’ to explain away our babbelas!

 

Blurring origin and vintage lines
for a good cause
4 December 2007

While my business partner navigated Jozi’s M1 last week I had a long telephone conversation with an exuberant and energetic German, Christoph Hammel of Weingut Hammel. Christoph – whose family has been making wine in the Rhine valley since 1723, was in South Africa to discuss plans for the launch of a new wine that is very close to his heart.

I say ‘plans’ because nothing has been finalised yet … so this is a little teaser of what should hit the shelves early in 2008, a blog exclusive if you like.

No stranger to joint ventures, Christoph has joined forces with the Company of Wine People’s Morné van Rooyen to produce what they call a ‘long-distance blend’. Actually, the 1 500 litres they’ve made is riesling, around two-thirds from the 2007 vintage in South Africa … the remainder from the 2006 vintage in Germany.

The plan is to sell the wine locally – European Union regulations forbid the sale of cross-border let alone cross-continent blends – to raise funds to support South Africa’s disabled soccer squad. Soccer-nutter Christoph saw them perform well despite lacking the support teams from wealthier countries had in the Disabled World Cup held in Germany in 2006, and decided to do what he could to help.

He approached the Company of Wine People with his on-the-surface hare-brained idea, and they jumped on board (actually, I defy anyone to refuse Christoph; wouldn’t the world be in such a better state if we all decided to act instead of just sympathise when we see someone, or something, in need?).

Grape’s team will taste the wine for its new releases page when it has been launched, and we’ll provide you with details of where to buy it. My ‘sneak preview’ was well made, with lots of riesling character, good balance and with oodles of flavour. The palate had a bright (but not tooth-stripping) acidity, it was quite ripe with lots of lime, had a slightly phenolic grip on the finish, and, of course, a slightly sweet lift in its tail.

G-o-o-o-a-a-a-a-l!

 

Numbers game? 30 November 2007

Last year, I had my idiosyncratic ‘winelands 1-2-3’ in hand: First Sighting, Two Cubs, Three Anchor Bay, Four Cousins, Five Soldiers, The Big Six Collection, Seven Falls, Eight Feet, Nine Yards … Seventeen Hundred!

This year, with Southern Cape Vineyards rationalising its range to exclude Seven Falls, I found myself scrambling to maintain the pattern. Until just last week, that is, when Paul Cluver jnr and Andries Burger showed Tim James and me their yet-to-be-released maiden Seven Flags pinot noir from the 2006 vintage. Actually this is the first public mention of the name they’re going to use, so it’s a blog-scoop – but the label isn't printed yet, so I can't show you that.

Established in 1896 in Elgin but only bottling its own wines since 1997 when the newly-appointed Andries took the first crush in hand, Paul Cluver Estate* has rather rapidly built itself an enviable reputation for high quality, yet value for money (not inexpensive), reds and whites. Interestingly, it’s the off-dry riesling and gewürztraminer, botrytised noble late harvest and Burgundian-influenced pinot noir that have achieved either popular acclaim or recognition through local and international awards systems, acclaim.

Even so, the ambitious team has long set its sights on producing a prestige pinot noir, one that will raise the bar for both themselves and other local pinot producers. (We’ll be reporting on a tasting of the standard 2006 shortly, in the Recent Releases section.)

The grapes for Seven Flags come from a ‘special patch’ within a single vineyard; after vinification the wine is gently aged in a selection of French barriques, from which Andries and Paul select the components for the blend.

In the glass, the 2006 was quietly confident, with soft black cherries subtly perfumed by oak spice and attractive earthy notes. The palate was silken, seemingly perfectly structured. It was a joy to sip over dinner, but I suspect it will improve further with several years cellaring.

Another wine was poured for comparison; this most definitely clearly communicated its French origins through that wonderfully organic but hard-to-pin-down goût de terroir character. It turned out to be a 2001 Grand Cru from Domaine Dujac, the Clos St Denis. It was stunning, also drinking beautifully but with the pedigree to age gracefully.

The verdict? The Dujac was really lovely, the Seven Flags charming and intelligent. Yes, the quality divide that was to be expected was there. But only just. I suspect the very limited production of the Cluver wine will be quickly snapped up and there’ll soon be another star in the global pinot firmament.

 

Desperately seeking a cellar rat?

What with the winemaker-cellar hopping season merrily under way, and over 70 new wineries a year coming onstream according to the 2008 Platter’s***, there’s always the chance that one or two wineries will find themselves without sufficient man – or woman – power in the cellar over the harvest. Chile doesn’t seem to be anticipating that problem if the following ‘promo’ is anything to go by: 'If your company is looking for a winemaker or harvest workers for this next season, let us know because we have several Chilean winemakers interested in working South Africa.' Anyone interested? Contact Maximiliano Morales for additional information.

 

Notes 

* First Sighting is made by Agulhas Wines, Two Cubs by Knorhoek Wines, Three Vines by Dellrust, Four Cousins by Van Loveren Private Cellar, Five Soldiers by Rustenberg Wines, The Big Six Collection is an export brand from Old Bridge Wines, and Eight Feet is made by Kloovenburg Vineyards, Nine Yards by Jordan Winery and Seventeen Hundred by Lourensford.

** Declaration of non-interest: I do not consult to the Paul Cluver Estate.

*** Declaration of interest: I am a taster on the Platter’s team:

 

A fridge for all reasons
29 November 2007

In Jozi, the city of the traffic jam, attending wrap-up meetings with my clients. Came across a wine-cum-deli fridge that’s been put to work in an unusual fashion. The client is Frieze Films, a production house working with agencies to put those ad epics on our television sets, and they keep the masters in the fridge to slow down degradation. Seeing as my gifts to clients this year is white wine, I suggest they clear a suitable spot post haste!

 

Generosity 26 November 2007

It is a measure of the collective generosity of Paul Cluver jnr and Andries Burger (of Paul Cluver Estate, as if you didn’t know) that after a tasting of their wines after a tour of their vineyards after a lunch they paid for, they insisted that Tim James and I also taste one or two wines from neighbour, Oak Valley Wines, as well as what is proudly (and only partially humorously) billed by its maker as ‘the best sauvignon blanc in Elgin’.

Being the gentlemen they are, they also put through a call to the winemakers concerned to ask their permission to broach their casks or bottles.

Oak Valley’s 2007 Pinot Noir is showing every promise of living up to the standard set by the 2005 and 2006 vintages. Viticulturist-cum-winemaker, Pieter Visser, manages to combine both red fruit and earthiness in a fresh and lightish – but no less serious – style. He’s relied a great deal on Andries’ advice, an easy thing to do given Andries’ knowledge of the grape and the fact that Pieter makes the wine in the Cluver cellar.

Izak van der Vyver also leans on the genial Burger for assistance. He’s the family doctor who crushes, in a small tank set aside for him by Andries, about a ton of sauvignon blanc each year. And he does it quite well, too.

Izak put in an appearance in the cellar after Andries’s call to him to personally present us with his wine. For an ‘amateur’ effort, it certainly looked professional, with a simple but cleanly designed label, certification sticker, indication of origin and bar code! Text on the label is all in Afrikaans – ‘If the French use their mother tongue, why can’t I use mine?’ he asks.

In the glass, the wine was certainly not amateurish either. It was light lemon in colour, had a forthcoming nose of fresh figs, black current leaves and a touch of capsicum, and plenty of grapefruit flavour, zingy acidity and chalky texture on the palate. Its balance and persistence was also very impressive.

Perhaps it is not the very best sauvignon from Elgin, but it can hold its head up high in the line-up from that cool ward. It is certainly far better than many other Cape sauvignons that I’ve tasted over the past months and years. And, with just 13% alcohol, an appropriate summer sipper.

Izak drinks or gives away as gifts about half his tiny production of about 800 bottles, and sells the rest at R60 a bottle to cover his costs.

‘I take my hat off to Izak,’ says Andries. ‘It’s not easy making such small quantities of sauvignon blanc, and he does such a great job.’ Absolutely! Anyone wanting to try this rare wine for themselves can get a bottle from the Houwhoek Farm Stall or the Spar in Grabouw.

 

What a difference a year makes (2)
(a bit more on Didier Dageneau's wines)
21 November 2007

Hans Petersher emailed to say he’d tasted the Coyade White I mentioned in my blog last week at a wine bar in London called Ottolenghi. Peter said he found it absolutely delicious and pointed out that it cost the fraction of the price of Didier Dagueneau’s Silex, which I’d also written about. He asked what I thought of the Coyade, a blend of maccabeu, grenache blanc and carignan blanc made in the Languedoc-Roussillon.

Rather than showing distinctive fruit or floral aromas, I found the bouquet to be quite neutral with nutty hints and some slight ‘oily’ (not turpene) notes. On the palate, it was rather big and bold with a firm alcohol and a slippery texture. I really liked it: it had personality and wasn’t run-of-the-mill. I didn’t identify it correctly – I thought it had Italian nuances – and scored it highly, but it was beaten into third place in my ranking of the five white wines we tasted. The other tasters weren’t as positive and the wine ranked 9th overall (out of 10) on the evening. But, given the line-up we had, I think it can hold its head up high, don’t you?

Hans also wanted to know if the wine is available in South Africa. I’m afraid I don’t know. I haven’t seen it in any shops or on any lists. Perhaps if one of our readers can answer that more definitively for you, Hans.

 

Elusive crustaceans 20 November 2007

Friday night’s dinner party had a dual role – to atone for the 12 months Philip and I have neglected four very close friends (who else but close friends would continually request our presence in their lives despite our persistent absence from their birthday celebrations, pizza oven christenings, ‘sop ‘n dop’ evenings and so on?), and to celebrate the opening of crayfish season.

The menu was simple - ish. We were to start with a lavish antipasto spread including razor clams, octopus and bonito, from my trip to Spain; Milanese salami and Black Forest ham, from someone else’s trip to Italy that I had a small hand in facilitating; and many other treats gleaned from two different shopping expeditions to two very special delicatessens (for the foodies, Al Dente in Somerset West and Lemon & Lime in Pringle Bay).  We were to end with decadent dark chocolate pots topped with white Lindt chocolate flakes. In contrast to these over-the-top ‘bookends’, gently steamed crayfish dressed with a little fresh lemon and Maldon salt was to be the main meal.

But Mother Nature had different ideas. The wind howled all Friday, whipping up white horses on top of the huge swells that rolled in. We know from bitterly cold and futile experience that crayfish don’t bite in this weather. We threw in the towel without even taking the rubber duck out of the garage.

Crayfish: 1 – Crew: 0.

Fortunately, Philip had lovingly concocted a gentle Moroccan lamb curry the night before and, judging from the wine selection, I must have had a feeling in my water that the sea wasn’t going to allow us to reap a harvest.

We started with prosecco, which seemed to complement the antipasto very well because no-one asked for a more serious tipple. Two rieslings followed as palate cleansers – Joh. Jos. Prüm 2004 Graacher Himmelreich Auslese and Dr Loosen 2004 Ürziger Würzgarten Spätlese, both with less than 8% alcohol. I really shouldn’t have opened these so young, but they were delicious.

With the lamb, we opened two bottles from St Emilion’s Château-Figeac, a 1979 and 1980. Although past their prime (and 1980 is a much-scorned vintage), these wines were still glorious and had sufficient sweet berry fruit to marry with the softly spicy dish. Various friends have had these two wines from the same source; some preferred the 1980, but I found the 1979 more complete, more youthful and more lively.

Despite everyone’s best efforts, only one was able to finish his dessert. Everyone else had a chocolate pot for breakfast. And the wind blew and blew all of Saturday and into Sunday. We eventually donned wet suits, launched into the south-easter, and caught up with the elusive crayfish just in time for lunch. But only just – four out of a possible quota of 16 is ‘only just’. But the season is long …

Crayfish: 1 – Crew: 1.

 

What a difference a (vintage) year makes
15 November 2007

It was Iona co-owner Andrew Gunn’s turn to host a tasting last night. He passed around five white and five red wines to be poured. Our objective? To find each white wine’s ‘pair’ in the red line up. Simple? Hardly; there were only four pairs, one white and one red being ringers. After nearly an hour and a half of swirling, sniffing, swallowing and spitting – and concentration, deliberation and elimination – we finished, having learnt a great deal along the way.

There were two Bordeaux: a Domaine de Chevalier 1994 (70% sauvignon blanc with semillon) and a Chàteau Figeac 1996 (equal portions cabernets sauvignon and franc, and 30% merlot); a Dog Point Chardonnay 2004 and a Stonecroft Syrah 2003, both from New Zealand; the Languedoc-Roussillon’s Vinci Coyade 2004 (maccabeu, grenache blanc and carignan blanc) and Le Clos des Fées 2004 (grenache, carignan, syrah, mouvedre); and a Clos de la Bergerie 1995 from Savennières in the Loire coupled with Bruwer Raats’ Cabernet Franc 2004, which emerged as the overall 'wine of the night'.[Excuse me Cath, but I can't beleive I'm the only one who'll wonder how those two are a pair? – ed]

The two odd wines out were Vinedos De Paganos’ El Puntido 2003 from Rioja in Spain, which scored 94 points from Robert Parker but was my lowest-scoring red wine (I thought it over-ripe and raisiny), and a Silex 2003 from the Loire’s ‘wild man’, Didier Dagueneau, which was my lowest-scoring white wine. This wine also landed up in 10th place once Andrew had taken scores and done the arithmetic.

Dagueneau makes four different dry white wines, all sauvignons from the Pouilly Fumé appellation of the Loire valley, pretty close to the geographical centre of France. At the lower end of the spectrum is En Chailloux, a blend from several vineyards. Buisson Menard is on the next rung up on the quality ladder … and then comes Silex and Pur Sang. These single vineyard wines are both grown on slate soils and are barrel fermented.

I’ve tasted vintages of Silex before and found it wonderfully rich but with a nervosity ringing through to its core. I did not identify the 2003 on the table as Loire sauvignon, let alone as a high quality example. And I wasn’t alone. Most of us found it overtly sauvignon but rather ‘flat’ and very short, more ‘pretty’ than stern.

Describing the 2004 vintage of the same wine, Wine Spectator’s James Molesworth said it ‘Cuts like a knife, with live-wire Key lime, grapefruit, chalk and sea salt notes. Rich and powerful, but very nervy through the long, mouthwatering, collar-grabbing finish. Almost severe now in its minerality, but just wait.’ He rated it 96.

Of course, the difference between what we had and what James was describing was the vintage – 2003 was an extremely warm year whereas 2004 was wetter and colder. In the Loire, most vignerons were excited by the extra ripeness of 2003 but, if our admittedly very limited experience of it is anything to go by, it seems it didn’t charm everyone. Oh, and James gave Silex 2003 93 points.

So which wine would I choose to have with crayfish (for those of you who don’t know, ‘kreef’ season opens today). I think the Savennières. But before I can set off to extract the delicacies from the sea, I have to extract Stitch from my lug box. She’s made it her lair in a bid to catch up on some beauty sleep after a particularly energetic and naughty day.

 

Out of the mouths of babes? 12 November 2007

Today is living up to its nickname – Blue Monday; if anything else goes wrong, they’ll hear me shriek in Riviersonderend. Consequently, today’s ray of wisdom, or dollop of nebulousness, is brief, curt, to the point.

Two of our wine commentators have raised the issue of price versus quality in their recent writings. On Winecoza, Neil Pendock writes (briefly) about the launch of two ‘excellent’ red blends: Waterford’s The Jem 2004 at R680 and the Quintette 2005 from Spar at ‘less than 10% of that’. (Anyone know how old Neil is, by the way? I’m 44 so, according to him, have only six years to go before I join the ranks of those ‘with palates past their physiological prime’.)

In his latest issue of Gulp!, Christian Eedes contrasts Vergelegen V 2004 with the 2003 vintage, and then asks whether or not ‘the quality on offer is in proportion to the price being asked’, which is R750 from the farm.

Thoughtfully argued in the one case, and rather perambulatory in the other (you be the judge), neither came close to succinctly encapsulating the simple relationship between price and value. Russian-American professor and author (Up the Down Staircase), Bel Kaufman, in my Monday opinion, does:

‘Children are the true connoisseurs. What is precious to them has no price, only value.’

 

A lesson never learnt 9 November 2007

At some stage in my past, I participated in what was described to me as a sound psychological test. It was possibly conducted while I was at university to illustrate a point, and it must have been the lecturer who painted the scenario: ‘You are one of seven survivors of a plane crash in the middle of nowhere. This is a list of the items you salvage from the wreckage. You may only chose three to take with you on your walk out of the desert. Which three would you chose?’

After making my choices as an individual, I recall being put in a group and ordered to discuss and come up with a ‘group’ list. The lecturer then disclosed the three most important items on the list, gave reasons for why they should have been chosen and then asked us to evaluate how we’d had done as (a) individuals and (b) members of a group.

On my own, I passed the ‘test’ with flying colours choosing the three vital items; as a member of the group, well, we’d still be out there struggling to survive. As soon as other members in the group had started to contest and debate my individual choices, I’d begun to doubt my original conclusions. By the time it came for the group to vote on which items they wanted on the list, the obvious wasn’t so obvious for me any more.

Since then, I’ve had several occasions to think back on this particular lecture, but I’m actually no further forward.

For example, on the final night of the Sydney International Wine Challenge there is a banquet. With each course, three or four different wines are served blind, and the judges of the week’s competition are asked to stand up and identify the wines giving their reasons.

The wines that I had to identify were an Orange Muscat, a Vin Santo and a botrytised Semillon. As soon as the wines were served, I sniffed and tasted them, and knew immediately what my answer was going to be – Orange Muscat, Vin Santo, Semillon, in that order. But then, another judge and other guests at my table began discussing the wines. They agreed with me about the Semillon but not about the other two wines. One man, in particular, was most convincing. He’d been to several of these dinners and at each one of these the Orange Muscat had been served. He knew it intimately, and it was wine 2. Everyone agreed with him.

I stood up to announce my conclusions and said – Vin Santo, Orange Muscat and Semillon. Of course, I was wrong – the only woman judge, the only South African MW there. I felt such a twit. Will I ever learn to make up my own mind and have confidence in my logic?

But here’s another example. Recently, I tasted some lovely German and Spanish wines, initially served blind. All we knew about the reds was that there was a common theme and two ‘sort of’ pairs. I tasted the first wine, which was my favourite. Pale garnet, it could have been Burgundy, Barolo, Rioja, Chianti – or just really old claret or syrah. The tannins and fruit weren’t Bordeaux, Rhône, Burgundy nor Chianti. So, it was Rioja or Barolo. For me, the wine lacked the sweetness of old Rioja. It also lacked the dry tannins of nebbiolo. So which was itI to be? Rioja or Nebbiolo.

The group conferred. Rather, Louise Hofmeyr and I conferred. More Rioja, she said. More Barolo, I said. Rioja it was. Will I ever learn to listen to people who have been making wine and tasting it, particularly older European wines?

Actually, in my mind, I had said ‘Rioja’ to myself, because the other wines were more Spanish than Italian and hence complied with the clues. Still, it appears as if I could be damned if I listen to myself, and damned if I listen to others. And there’s no hard and fast rule as to when. Guess what I really have to focus on is to stop beating myself up when I get it wrong. Excuse me, while I get off the couch!

 

More glass stories 7 November 2007

Following my shattering experience last week, Clive Sindelman wrote to say that I’m an absolute amateur. His best attempt so far has resulted in 13 smashed Riedel glasses (I’d still be crying). Clive wonders if that’s a South African record – I’m pretty sure somehow, sometime, someone at the Nederburg or CWG auctions, or even a wedding in Krugersdorp, has been responsible for more than a baker’s dozen, Clive. But maybe not Riedels at those events.

Moving on, I discovered some glorious decanters designed by French sculptor Etienne Meneau.

They’re limited editions (only about 9 of each are made), hold the standard 750ml bottleful of wine, are about 65 centimetres tall, and are made from Pyrex glass. The one shown here containing the red wine can be yours for a mere $4000 from Dean & Deluca, the ultra-fancy New York deli and home goods shop  (click here to add the decanter to your shopping basket).  

Now I remember Pyrex as being a very tough, thick glass; my mother went through a phase in the 70s, I think, of replacing all her old serving dishes with Pyrex ones. ‘From the freezer, to the oven, to the table’ was the advertising jingle. Or was that for Corningware? Doesn’t matter.

What does matter is that neither Clive nor I should be allowed anywhere near!

 

Shattered! 2 November 2007

So there I was just after ten o’clock the other night, after a glorious tasting at Cornel Spies’ home, quietly making my way down the 54 steep stairs that wind from our garage through the garden to the front door, carefully balancing two six-glass boxes of fancy red wine glasses, my mobile, my car keys, my house keys, my note pad and a pen, when the phone shrieked.

In my haste to settle its piercing tones before it woke the neighbours (I was at bedroom level of both houses) I lost my grip and watched as one precious box fell onto the slope and bounced four times before settling on the step 20 paces below.

Bedroom windows flew open and I assured the two concerned voices from the dark that there was nothing more sinister going on.

Six glasses shattered – this is all that’s left. Next time, I’ll take a handbag and leave the phone off.

 

Delicious cheapie sweetie fools them again
31 October 2007

A long, long time ago, at least three years, before Luke had after-school activities to keep him out of our hair while we worked, we employed an au pair, or Luke-fetcher-sitter-entertainer.  Adele was a s