
OPEN SPACE
Return to
Grape home page
Return to list of Open Space topics
|
Reporting on our tastings 4 December 2007 A suggestion for Grape
From Rudy:
Response from the editor: In fact, we try to avoid anything like an averaged score, for that very reason. We actually try to arrive at a score we all agree on - or at least approximately agree on: if there's only a half-point or so difference, no-one usually stands on principle and thinks that that is a significant matter. It must be said that sometimes one or more of us will change our minds about the score after discussion – we always discuss the wines and our reactions. If one person continues to be higher or lower. that will be mentioned. If there's a lot of disagreement we either come up with an average and point out that there were differences in rating, or else the person who is doing the writing up of the note will use his/her own score and report ofn the differences. But you know this and are suggesting something a bit different. We will discuss your idea, which is a valid one - though I feel that if there is only a difference of half-a-point or so, reporting it could give a wrong idea of the value of a score - which we feel is less important than the tasting note, really. Also, we value the opportunity of discussing the wine and sometimes changing our own scores slightly - I think that the more considered opinion is usually the better opinion (certainly in my own case). Certainly it might be a good idea to give the actual scores when there is a significant difference of opinion. We will talk it over.
|