|
Woman
winemaker of the
year announced
27 July 2007
An ambassador and role model too
The finalists of the SA Woman
Winemaker of the Year competiton need no special pleading: Susan Wessels
of Vrede en Lust, Elzette du Preez of De Grendel, Alicia Rechner of
Backsberg, Tania Joubert of KWV, Rianie Strydom of Haskell Vineyards,
and Ruth Frances-Penfold of Steenberg Vineyards.
What the judges were looking
for in this (sometimes controversial) competition was not simply a
top-flight winemaker, however. The wanted ‘a woman who will be an
ambassador for the South African wine industry, and a role model for all
women who are considering a career as a winemaker.’ The winner, it was
announced, ‘should be someone who is motivated, professional and shows
integrity, energy and initiative in her chosen field in the wine
industry.’
Finalists
were selected by the judging panel (also all women) through a blind
tasting of the wines they submitted. After the women were interviewed,
the winner was announced: Susan Wessels, winemaker (for upwards of a
year) at Vrede en Lust winery in Paarl. Susan has a B.Sc. in Viticulture
and Oenology from Stellenbosch University, and was assistant winemaker
at Neethlingshof before joing Vrede en Lust last year. Her prize is an
all-expenses paid trip to Bordeaux.
|
|
COMMENTS
From Lynne:
Well done Susan, we are proud of you. You are meaning a lot to Vrede en
Lust.
From George Spies:
How big was that tank of viognier? I heard about 1 500 litres. All I can
say is if it takes 1500l to become woman winemaker of the year, There
are a lot of people in the running for it
From Katrien Colyn:
I find the Woman Winemaker of the Year awards rather strange. In a world
and day, where women so desperately try to function as equals to men, I
don't see why there should be a competition for women and then a
competition for winemakers. The woman winemaker of the year awards was
held last week. The winemaker who won according to the judges won
because of the viognier that she entered. I believe the amount of
viognier produced by the cellar was more or less 2% of the total cellar
capacity and might I add that she was assisted by a male consultant.
I feel
that the awarded winemaker of the year should have proven to have a
consecutive history of good wines and not a single small batch of wines
their first harvest. By all means - award the wines if it is good, but
in order to be acknowledged as a constant good winemaker, surely one
vintage of 2000 litres of one wine does not immediately make of you
winemaker of the year? I am in the food industry, love wines and wine
tasting and owned restaurants for years. I could not enter my restaurant
as a top restaurant as these women did. I had unannounced food crits
coming to the restaurant eating my food and writing about it without me
knowing about it. Surely one can manipulate wines for a competition in
order to get publicity for your wine and cellar. One of the finalists is
not even making wine anymore. No doubt that all the finalists are very
talented people with great skills, I just think the merits of the
judging and the requirments are not strict enough and could mislead the
public when it comes to the results of the rest of the wines these
cellars produce and uninformed people end up buying.
From
Alicia Rechner, winemaker at Backsberg:
Some sour grapes - as a finalist in the competition, I feel that it was
not about wine or winemaking. The judges were looking for a female
feminist who happens to be a winemaker. I feel stupid that I even
entered, believing they would judge my wine.
From Amanda Du Toit:
I am a avid (non-famous) reader of Grape and enjoy most of the
'stirring' (sometimes negative), and wit by the cynical Wid, but what
really got my hair up was some of the reaction to the results of the
Women Winemaker of the Year competition. You wonder what makes a
person’s first reaction to the success of someone else to be negative
attack on all women winemakers that would dare to enter a competition
for the said. Is it a jealous male winemaker using a pseudo name of
“Katrien Colyn” or is this some bitter non-achiever whom can not stand
the success of another of the same sex? I must admit that I tried to
Google both “Katrien Colyn” and “George Spies” to look at their long
list of achievements as I have not heard of them. “Katrien Colyn” did
not have one hit in South Africa, whereas the only “George Spies” in the
wine industry that I could find, was the famous late Production Manager
of SFW that became famous for his ’66 and ’68 GS Cab Sav wines.
As for the Viognier or the lack thereof, it seems that Susan Wessels won
because “The winner, it was announced, ‘should be someone who is
motivated, professional and shows integrity, energy and initiative in
her chosen field in the wine industry.’
Well done Susan and the organisers of the competition. We are proud of
what you stand for and keep up the good work.
From Katrien Colyn:
How much does those aspects have to do with winemaking though,
Amanda? One could find it them in a school teacher or even a prostitute.
From George Spies:
I googled Amanda du Toit and the only thing I could find
was a woman released from prison in October 2001. You must be a loyal
friend...
From Bertha Kruger:
Well done Alicia. You have won wine competitions that are much more
convincing than this ridiculous funfair. Backsberg should be very proud!
|
|
From Mrs
Miniver:
My dears, apropos this female winemaker, I have to tell you this. My
husband was niggling our youngest yesterday about doing well when she
goes to Elsenburg in a year or so (when and if she passes... (what is
matric these days?). He was going on about taking care with those lips
and nails while working the pump-overs during harvest, and keeping her
body nice and trim, so that she too might enter the Woman Winemaker of
the Year and stand a chance to be photographed in a nice pose for
Landbouweekblad's lusty lads with that curious trophy covered in
lipstick.
You see,
Henry, who gladly acknowledges his roaming eye, had spoken to an old
flame who has been making wine for quite a few years in a
well-known let's-not-mention-the-name winery. Admittedly Henry phoned
her after a few pre-dinner dops, so I'm not entirely sure that he heard
accurately. But he says his old flame (a well-known winemaker for
a let's-not-mention-the-name producer), was fed up that she would not
stand a chance competing against the company of the 'jong bokkies' or 'stukkies
in die kelder'. Also she doesn't fit into her bikini any more. Henry's
eye dimmed briefly in memory of the latter, but promptly turned to our
youngest, who was interested in seeking fame and fortune in winemaking.
What Henry
hadn't reckoned on was Timmy popping into the conversation. Now, I must
tell you it wasn't easy, but it is after all the new South Africa and
we, Henry and I, have accepted that Timmy is different. And Timmy, who
doesn't mind being called 'gay' by his sisters, also likes wine.
‘You
realise,’ Timmy said ‘it's all a bunch of old-girls who decide, after
asking funny questions. There's no he-men on that panel.’
Instantly
Henry got a little nervous about our youngest and her wine-making plans.
It was then that Timmy saved the day.
‘I think,'
he said ‘I'll ask my pal whether he wouldn't start a black gay
winemaker-of-the-year thingy when his dad gets that BEE share in the
let's-not-mention-the-name winery. Somewhere in the Helderberg region
maybe... ’
|
From
Alex Brits:
Well, I'm not convinced it was a beauty contest entirely (by the look of
the winner - aren't they suppose to be at least 5' 11”?) but surely
there won't be enough Viognier to try for all these
anti-woman-winemaking people... so how are we ever going to know if this
blondie was really judged by the quality of her wine?
From Joan Brits:
The Woman Winemaker of the Year competition was founded with the goal in
mind to highlight woman in the wine industry that have the ability to
deliver a top quality product. Nowhere is it stipulated that this
individual must produce a minimum quantity of wine. Nowhere does it
stipulate that the individual must have produced wine for a minimum
number of years prior to the competition nor that they must produce wine
for a minimum number of years after the competition. The simple
deliverable is a top quality product made by the individual and entered
into the competition. This wine is a product which carries a
certification sticker on the bottle and once produced can not be
tampered with in any way in order to manipulate the product into a
competition winning form.
At the same time, as is the case with
the Miss South Africa competition (which is not called Miss Beautiful
South Africa), the competition aims to highlight individuals who contain
the whole package. People who can be an ambassador for the competition
and industry.
As the Americans say, Enough Already!
Good grief, if the South African wine business and all it's stakeholders
cannot yet understand the importance of ANY competition and ANY
publicity opportunity, then the industry truly is in a sorry state. Is
it only in the wine industry that people are so bitchy, because I don't
see any similar debates flying around the Business Woman of the Year
competition, or the CITI’s Women in ICT Entrepreneur Competition or
POWA's Woman's Writing Competition or for that matter the Strong Woman
competition.
Susan is obviously a worthy winner and
the fact that Alicia now has ‘Sour Grapes’ is perhaps because this is
the second time that she made it into the finals and still wasn't able
to clinch the title. She may be able to make good wine (otherwise she
wouldn't be a finalist), but then perhaps her bitchy comments are proof
that, after all, the judges made the right choice. Fact of the matter
is, all entrants are made aware that the judgement is not merely on the
product and that they will all be put through a rigorous interview
process to determine the ambassador. The odd thing is that if this
competition was so feminist, why did she enter the second time?
Another interesting feminist counter
argument is why would an all woman judging panel (who have survived and
succeeded in a male dominated industry) sway from the core wine making
importance?
Katrien is quite correct, the aspects
outside of winemaking could well be found in any individual (even a
prostitute). However, the competition is not prostitute of the year. Its
Woman Winemaker of the Year. Although – judging prostitute of the year
could be very interesting!!!
I have been watching the development
of the Woman Winemaker Award over the past years with interest, from Ivy
to Debbie to Eleanor and now Susan. They are all beautiful, competent
and talented women who I am proud to look up to as a role model for
women in South Africa.
With all the side show antics, sour
grapes and mud slinging aside, the competition meant to highlight the
individual who could produce a top quality product and who embodies the
passion for her product and the industry. For this I applaud Susanne
Wessels. Vrede en Lust has struck gold with the choice of wine maker.
Come on
people - Stop throwing stones and lift a glass in appreciation for what
this farm and the individual have managed to achieve.
From Chris le Roux:
Was it not just beginners luck? It will be interesting to see what
happens to this awarded winemaker. Wouldn't surprise me if she's married
to some or other wine farm owner (like her father thought) in 5 years
time...
|
|
From Anel Smit:
So Susan, are you going for winemaker of the year as well? Why don't
you see what happens when you take part in the real thing...
From Alicia
Rechner:
Joan Brits and company, I am sorry if my comment sounded bitchy. It was
not meant to be bitchy, it was more a harsh statement about how I felt,
but point taken. I suppose I am really quite sour, both times I entered
I made it straight to the finals each time to lose against someone at
least five years younger, with a wine that came out of 8 barrels. They
should state in the rules that if you are an old bag with exciting wines
you should not bother. I think I got it all out of my system now and
will move on. Well done Susan and Vrede en Lust!
From Marilou
Marais:
Maybe the judging should not just be a blind tasting, but the
interviews must have judges blind folded. It would certainly help me if
I ever entered for a competition.
Joan Brits:
I can see from the quality of comment that I have obviously been wrong
about wine people…. I always thought they were a bit more civilised and
enlightened than the rest…but Anel Smit, et al you have proven me wrong.
Everyone knows
that the outcome of all the various wine competitions are rarely the
same. And by the way the Diners Club winemaker of the year competition
is judged every year on ONE specific varietal…, so, if you want to be
critical, you can argue that whoever wins for instance with a Chenin
Blanc, if that is the particular year’s category cannot be referred to
as WINEMAKER OF THE YEAR, but must strictly speaking be the Chenin maker
of the year… and so we can dissect every single competition. Why do
double gold winners at Veritas not win top honours in other
competitions, etc? Because every competition are judges by different
people, with different criteria.
From an
outsider’s point of view it is sad that people from an industry with so
many problems and challenges can spend so much time ridiculing each
other. I would have thought that any marketing opportunity that would
even attract one extra wine consumer, or some attention to the industry
would be applauded, not shot down.
By the way, I
heard that Susan had two wines in the top ten line up, before the six
finalists were chosen, her Sauvignon Blanc was only beaten by a
heartbeat by her Viognier. So this was obviously not just a lucky
shot.
Like my
English teacher always said … settle down now. |
|
From
Norma Ratcliffe:
A few comments from the head Judge of the Women Winemaker of the Year
competition. Many of the comments stated above are very valid. Just
remember that the women winemakers were not the finalists in this
competition, their wines were the finalists in the competition. These
wines were all tasted blind and the wines that were the final top wines
were retasted blind to make sure that there were no errors. Susan
Wessels had a Viognier and a Sauvignon Blanc in the top 3 wines in this
final lineup. Her averagescore for the 2 wines was higher than any other
competitor. We then interviewed the women to make sure that there were
no other problems with the finalists. We did encounter one that has been
clearly stated on this site. One of the winemakers is no longer making
wine at all. She, however, was not in the top three. We avoided a tricky
situation here by realizing tht we wanted a woman that is currently
making wine and can serve as a role model, not someone who has left the
industry.
Katrien, you
might have a valid point about the number of litres that one has made of
that wine to qualify. It is to be considered. Do you know how many
litres of Sauvignon Blanc that Susan made?
Perhaps
we should have an age limit? If you are for example over 35, please do
not enter. If you are under 30, please do not enter. If you have not
been making wine for 10 years or more, please do not enter. Do not enter
a wine that is less than 10 000 litres. Give us some more advice for
future competitions.
From H van der Merwe:
Ek lees nou die afgelope week, al die kommentaar wat gelewer word na
afloop van die vroue wynmaker van die jaar kompetisie. Dit verbaas my
glad nie dat daar sulke uiteenlopende opinies is oor die uikoms van die
kompetisie nie. Dit is maar altyd die geval wanneer so 'n groot bedryf
betrokke is. Ek dink dat
hierdie kompetisie deur 'n groep kundige mense saamgestel en deurgevoer
is. So 'n groep het gewoonlik 'n vasgestelde
lys waarvolgens punte verdien word in die kompetisie en die uitslag hang
daarvan af. Dat Susan Wessels hierdie jaar se keuse was, maak dit vir
haar die jaar wat sy uitgestaan het deur miskien uitstekende en unieke
wyne en dalk goeie antwoorde op die paneel se vrae.
Dit was die regte tyd en die regte plek vir haar.
Dit is maar hoe meeste
kompetisies werk. Ek dink dit is in die algemeen 'n baie positiewe ding
dat so 'n jong meisie gewen het, dit wys vir ander jong wynmakers dat
daar baie geleenthede is wat ontgin kan word en dat sukses nie aan
ouderdom verbind is nie, maar aan jou eie initiatief en ondernemings
gees! Ek hoop daar is elke jaar so baie en uiteenlopende opinies is oor
die wenner, want dit beteken dat die titel van vroue wynmaker, hoog op
die prys gestel word en as baie belangrik gesien word.
Geniet jou jaar as titel houer Susan, en
mag dit vir jou baie proffesionele sukses bring. Ek sien sommer al
klaar uit na volgende jaar se kompetisie!!
From Carol de Villiers:
Replying to Ms Ratcliffe's comments, just the following:
I think any wine competition is a good
idea should it be conducted in a credible manor. It creates awareness
of certain wines that would not have been noticed by the public and as
Joan Brits commented, the more wine buyers the better. What I don't
understand is why Ms Brits used the Miss SA competition as an example,
as the girls are requested to enter pictures of themselves in bikinis
and the whole world knows it is actually Miss Beautiful SA. Also, why
can a winemaker over 35 hypothetically not enter? Would a 35 year old
not be a better representative for the wine industry, rather than a
green keen winemaker with limited experience and exposure?
My
suggestion is: Have the Woman Winemaker of the Year competition as –
regardless of the fuss made the past two weeks ( and I can't say I
disagree) – I doubt that it ever will be cancelled, but have certain
guide lines. The winemaker cannot have a consultant as in the case of
this year - Nico Vermeulen actively assisted on making wines on the
farm. The batch of wines entered must be a minimum of x000 litres and
not a miniature tank of "by chance" good wine. And finally, being
awarded as a winemaker of the year you must have a track record of a
couple of good seasons. Before that, the wine can do the talking in any
case. (After three good seasons and wine awards, by all means Susan
Wessels could have been awarded Winemaker of the Year. But 5 weeks in
France, 22 months as assistant winemaker and one harvest with an
experienced consultant does not convince me and by the look of it a lot
of others as well.
|
From
Samantha O'Keefe:
I am a woman. Not a South African. I come from a country where
it is not immediately assumed there is a man somewhere in your
portfolio that has helped you get to where you are. I am a
winemaker. I make wine with my husband. It may be that in quiet
corners people are whispering that our wines really "came from his
wife"... but more than likely it is the other way around.
This dialog has not just saddened me, it has sickened me. I cannot
believe that women would use the kind of language that they have
regarding the success of another woman. For South Africa to progress
in the battle of the sexes, it is the women, more than the men, who
will have to grow up. They will have to believe that women bring
intelligence, talent, intuition and, I suppose, independence, into
everything they do- with or without male partners. The dialog
attached to this article says a lot about the women who wrote in and
I am very sorry for it.
From S van der Spuy:
I am truly surprised by the personal
attack on Susan. Just like so many people who have already
commented, I also feel that a few set guidelines should be set in
place regarding the actual competition. But no matter how much one
may disagree with the way a competition is run, it never justifies
being as rude to the winner as some of the people above have been.
Sies, man! If you have a problem, direct it to the person(s)
directly involved. Alecia, I used to have the utmost respect for you
(I admired the fact that you completed the 2004 harvest, even though
you were so close to giving birth to your little boy. THAT is worthy
of an award!) But I am sorry to say that you have just lost a couple
of points in the eyes of the wine drinking public. And the sad part
is that whatever you say in public, reflects on your winery. Honesty
is such a rare, admirable characteristic, but to reveal one's sour
grapes in public the way you have, is downright foolish.
From Alicia
Rechner:
S vd Spuy. I am regretting ever reading and commenting here, but now
I am addicted. I did say sorry and I do not think anybody meant to
insult Susan. I do not even know her. I have met her once and meant
her no harm. Just the competition and what it is trying to prove.
Please just let that be understood.
|
|
The end.
It seems time to draw this sometimes bitter, sometimes very interesting
debate to an end. A lot has been learnt by many people, probably -
including the organisers of the event.
Oh. Not quite the end...
|
From
Katrien Colyn:
I never thought my opinion regarding the Woman Winemaker of the Year
would trigger such a reaction. I was not attacking the winner, but
merely commenting on the credibility of the whole affair. What I find
sad is that people do not respect the views of a good winemaker like
Alicia Rechner, but rather defend this silly contest. I think it takes
'balls' (if I may say so) to stand up and give your opinion the way she
did. I never thought her comment was aimed at Susan Wessels, but rather
the competition and the rules. The finalists were chosen 2 weeks before
the final. All those judges (if they did their homework well) should
have known by then that the KWV winemaker was no longer making wine.
Does this not prove (following the rest of their comments and input)
that it really does not go about the wine (or the winemaker as a non
winemaker was a finalist) but the pretty face behind the title, with the
strangest trophy! Rumour has it, the other finalists were as disgusted!
It would be nice knowing what they think.From Marilou Marais:
I reckon it's a fish - as something is very fishy about this contest....
From T van
Zyl:
Reply on H vd Merwe. Jy het die woorde so uit my mond geneem Me van der
Merwe! Wat 'n sukses vir Susan Wessels! Dit is altyd jammer as mense
bitter optree teenoor ander se sukses. Aan almal wat tog so graag ander
subtiel afkraak omdat hulle mooi is voel ek jammer voor. Ek dink nie
daar is enige kriteria in die kompetisie wat sę jy moet in \'n nommer 8
bikini inpas of dat jy blou oë en blonde hare moet hę nie. Ek drink
Susan Wessels se wyn al vandat sy by Neethlingshof haar begin gemaak het
en ek kan met eerlikheid sę dat ek nog nooit \'n slegte wyn van haar
gedrink het nie. Hulle word net al hoe beter!!! Geluk Susan, mag hierdie
eer jou aanspoor om nog beter te wees en dat alle kritiek wat jy ontvang
as positief ervaar sal word om jouself net nog meer te verbeter. En daai
wat sę jy gaan anyway met \'n ryk boer trou, ophou wyn maak en heeldag
by die huis sit... ons met vertroue in jou weet anyway baie beter! Ons
getroue Vrede en Lust wyndrinkers is trots op jou en sal jou dophou soos
jy naam maak in hierdie kompeterende industrie! Geluk!
|
|
|
| |