
29 September 2004
The Brett Police
We in the Cape are
catching up with Australia not only in conning people into accepting that
sweetish alcoholic fruitjuice is wine but also, they say, in ever-rising
levels of brett. You know, that spoilage yeast that sometimes seems to be a
nice thing, but is more than often anything but. (Someone once told me I was
rather like a bretty wine – never maturing properly, just getting older and
nastier – but that was unsubstantiated malice of the type that I’m sure we
all just treat with contempt.)
Anyway, the Brett
Police are out and about. The problem is that there’s much more opinion than
knowledge or certainty out there. At the recent Winex show in Cape Town half
of those attending seemed to be rushing around whispering to each other to
go and try that one also – full of brett! So that just about every wine has
an accuser, and often a defender too. (I’ll only believe people when they
show me the laboratory analysis sheet from now on, I think.) The whole
accusation business is getting into the open now. The latest Wine mag has
Michael Fridjhon saying that there’s brett in Rust en Vrede wines, and
someone else writing in to accuse Springfield....
So it’s a sign of the
times and of a rather worried industry that a big workshop on brett was held
in Stellenbosch recently. No-one from the press was allowed, we discovered,
even if someone thinks she has a legitimate existence beyond scribbling
occasionally for a rag like Grape. Perhaps this ban was to encourage
confessions: ‘Hi, my name’s Koos and I’ve had brett in my wines for two
years....’ But I do wish that winemakers would try to educate the hacks a
bit more, rather than just moaning at their lack of knowledge and
understanding.
André’s little game
The little flurry of
excitement around whether or not superstar winemaker André van Rensburg is
to leave Vergelegen seems to be subsiding now – though, as I write, André is
still refusing to confirm that he’s staying until his new contract is
actually signed. Presumably a much more lucrative one, that he’s wrung out
of his notoriously stingy bosses by at least implicitly threatening to go.
So who was it, one
wonders, that started spreading the rumours that he was off to L’Ormarins,
thus putting pressure on the Vergelegen bosses just prior to their budget
meeting? Could it have been our dear André himself?
What is pretty
certain is that this is not the first time he’s applied for other winemaking
jobs, or responded positively to headhunters. Not that he always gets the
offer – it was very strongly rumoured a year or so back that he’d applied
for the position at Klein Constantia (probably also to either feed his ego
or to further his battle with his bosses), but had been gently turned down.
Not every winery is equipped to cope with an enfant terrible....
The ones I feel a bit
sorry for in the whole situation are the guys who are already making wine at
L’Ormarins. I wonder when they heard that they were to have a superstar put
in above them. Great for morale.
Of course, if the
Rupert ambitions at the Franschhoek winery demand a newsworthy winemaker
(and Rupert money is endless, of course), who will get the job, if not
André? One gossip-monger suggests John Loubser of Steenberg – rumour has it
that that property is to be carved up into ‘gentlemen’s wine estates’, which
is probably not the sort of future that a serious winemaker wants.