|

10 December
2004
Colly Collard lashes
out, in the best
possible taste
It’s up to me, apparently to tell the
rather unedifying story of a bit of fallout from the now-withdrawn
defamation suit emerging from a few little observations of mine (click
here
for that story). This latter episode involves a moustached
little man named Colin Collard. Now, I don’t wish to seem prejudiced, but my
dear departed husband, a rather large chap, used always to warn of the
problems that can lurk in apparently inoffensive small men. But perhaps this
latest turn in Col’s behaviour is down to arrogance because of the riches
gained though owning the successful Wine-of-the-Month Club; who knows?
He also owns and edits an associated
magazine called Good Taste (which allows me to hope, at least, for a saving
sense of irony). You might have heard of it: not long ago he decided that
only he should have a magazine with the word ‘taste’ in the title, and went
to court in an unsuccessful attempt to take another magazine off the
shelves. Good Taste seems to me a glossy vehicle for trivia, advertisements
and advertorials: to serious journalism, you might say, what Amarula Cream
is to fine old cognac. The sort of thing that the advertising/magazine
industry loves to give effusive praise and awards to, of course. (And Grape,
you ask, on this continuum? – well, perhaps a good SA brandy).
I’m told that a journalist who left it recently just
couldn’t take the hollowness
of it all any more.
(You must excuse my diversions, I’m old
and a trifle exercised over all this.)
Surprising but true – it must be
admitted that Col doesn’t think very highly of Grape in general or of my
style of engaging with the world, and he took a strongly partisan position
alongside Mr Howe, who was suing us (he apparently writes for Col). Keen to
argue his case that one shouldn’t say nasty things about others, he let fly
with a startling display of anti-Grape splutterings to a journalist writing
about the court case.
Then, following the withdrawal of the
lawsuit, vindictiveness seemed to succeed vitriol, and Col started harrassing
our Associate Editor, Angela Lloyd, who has been a member of the tasting
panel of his wine mail order outfit for over eighteen years.
He might have thought that Angela’s
contaminating association with Grape was harmful to her judging abilities –
anyway, he demanded again and again that she distance herself from Grape’s
editor, and notably what had been said in my little column and taken as
defamatory. Angela, of course, didn’t see why she needed to say anything at
all about it to Colly. What on earth did her opinions about wine-writing
integrity have to do with him, or her work for him?
So he asked her (by email, all of this
– he doesn’t seem keen on attacking a long-term employee in what my husband
would have called a ‘manly’ face-to-face manner) to resign from the tasting
panel. She declined. ‘Well then you’re fired’, writes he. Another email told
her briefly that she had, er, messed up (I’m old-fashioned, dearies, and
can’t bring myself to use the obscenity that Colly thought appropriate in
the circumstances).
Now, I believe, after some other people
have suggested to him that this is not really sufficient grounds for firing
someone, he’s adducing all sorts of other reasons.
But there we are. That is how a person
outraged by my rudeness sees fit to exercise his own good nature and sense
of fair play.
Not that it’s the first time that Col
has been involved in questionable dismissive behaviour with those who work
for him. On a previous occasion the relevant official body found him guilty
of unfair constructive dismissal, and Collard Media was ordered to pay R36
800 in compensation to the employee. Did she get the money, though? Not a
chance. The CC was pretty promptly liquidated: not unreasonably Ms du Preez
felt this was a rather improper ploy to avoid paying her.
Certainly Col – very far from insolvent himself – did not feel that his
sense of honour required the settling of this debt. Now, if Angela deigns to
pursue the current matter through legal channels, I can’t see how this
occasionally choleric little man will again avoid paying up.
|