
Let them eat
cake and drink Screaming Eagle (and other quaint tales of American life)
18 June 2005
The reason why some publicity-conscious
local wine label punters and producers make a beeline for the flashy
American Wine Spectator magazine and its ratings (dear God, please let it
get more than 90 out of 100!) as the ultimate accolade, is all too obvious:
the publication is the foremost promoter of wine as a snobbish business. As
wine mags and columns around the world reduce themselves to being lists of
ratings and prices, the Speculator heads the pack, with Decanter panting
desperately behind, trying (quite successfully) to lower itself to that
level.
With its larger-than-any-other format,
and glossy advertisements ranging from golfing estates to private jets, many
have wondered why the world’s more famous – and expensive – wine labels tend
to get the top ratings, despite so-called blind tastings. (I’m intrigued to
see, actually, whether Rust en Vrede continues to feature in the annual Top
100 list now that Jean Engelbrecht has left his dad to do the PR
schmoozing.)
The magazine’s readership, judged from
the letters page, is also a pretty dull if upmarket lot, mostly writing in
to thank the kind editors for pointing out another five-star,
ultra-expensive eatery in their neighbourhood that they are given official
permission to enjoy.
In a recent issue, however, one reader
seems to ruffle the glossily permed feathers of the editorial team. His note
is worth quoting – especially for the would-be big-timers from the
Helderberg and Simonsberg. ‘I can afford to drink any wine I wish and
usually do with dinner every evening. That said, I increasingly find your
magazine to be immoral and snobbish’, it says. ‘When most of the world’s
people can’t even afford raw “moonshine” (or clean water, for that matter),
you make us Americans look like Louis XIV’s French court just before the
revolution. For shame. Let’s drink it but not flaunt it. Stop inviting the
world to hate and fear but not respect us.’ (That is, it’s all OK and the
world economy is really well organised, just don’t tell Osama and the
peasants about what we do….)
In reply, the editor mumbles on about
‘outstanding wines that happen to be expensive’, but it is the pompous last
sentence that surely must have had the letter-writer giggling in his Riedl
glassful of $200 cabernet: ‘Maintaining high standards is not “flaunting”
anything; it shows respect and admiration for those whose talent and hard
work allow them to excel.’ With the reference to hard work, I suspect he
doesn’t mean the grape-pickers. So, now, isn’t that a sweet message for our
own $100-plus wine peddlers?
***
Actually, whenever I get depressed
about things local, I do find it a good tonic to glance at life in America.
An old friend who lives, believe it or not, in Arizona sent me the following
quote from an advertising blub from Ravenswood Winery, bringing civilisation
to the desert in the form of ultra-ripe, ultra-alcoholic zinfandel:
‘The Ravenswood Zinfomaniac Tour is
hitting Phoenix at Sportsmans this month. The Ravenswood urban assault
vehicle will roll up to our Camelback and Arrowhead locations, ready to
bring you a charged wine sampling experience in true Zinfomaniac form. Check
out the zinners confessional where consumers can confess to drinking wimpy
wines, outdoor e-card photo booth, sampling bar (taste 15 Ravenswood wines)
and the TV featuring Ravenswood wine history, product and fun!’
Doesn’t that make our own dear PR
people – and our own dear pinotage – seem splendidly chaste and refined?
***
Although better perhaps the non-wimpy
zinfandel peddlers and the wine spectators and speculators than the
abolitionists who seem to dourly lurk. I recently learnt (oh, the glories of
the internet!) that an illustrated edition of ‘Little Red Riding Hood’ was
banned in two California school districts some years back. Following the
line as told in the traditional fairy tales collected by the brothers Grimm,
the book shows the heroine taking food and wine to her grandmother. The
pious school authorities were apparently less exercised by the vulpine
violence of the story than by its appallingly non-censorious use of alcohol.
Wine for granma indeed! As someone of granma’s age I feel the pain.