Grape

Curiouser and curiouser ...

As Alice in Wonderland might have said as she tumbled down  an – um – tin mine shaft.

If the Cape’s  wine community is naturally extremely concerned about African Exploration Mining and Finance Corporation (Pty) Limited’s application to prospect for various minerals on prime wineland on the Bottelary and Tygerberg Hills, it is also scratching its collective heads as to why it was made at all.

The Wonderland analogy continues with the adverts requesting notice of  affected or interested parties to register by 12th February; these  were placed in English media only, on 10th and 19th February, the latter after the deadline! In fact, most landowners discovered by chance about AEM’s intention  – one on Facebook, another in church.

The bottom line is that in no way – neither economically nor strategically – does the application make any sense.

AEM&FC is a wholly owned subsidiary of the Central Energy Fund, which is controlled by the Department of Mineral Resources. It will be the Minister of that Department, Susan Shabangu, who, after studying the public participation process and environmental management plan, will decide whether or not to grant the mining licences. A clear case of a conflict of interests, or as someone put it, this is ‘putting the fox in charge of the hen house.’

The strange thing is that while the DMR looks intent on destroying areas with highly endangered vegetation, it was the national government who supported the establishment of this UNESCO biodiversity site!

At a meeting at Jordan wine farm Wednesday, independent geologist, Stephen Davey, explained why strategically this application doesn’t make sense. Over a hundred year period 778 tons of tin has been mined from the area where prospecting is planned, just 28 tons from the hills (now home to prime Stellenbosch vineyards), the rest from lower in the creek; this represents less than one per cent of tin found in the country; thus an uneconomic proposition. (The top part of the photo taken from Jordan and with Table Mountain in the background, is part of the area where the smaller amount of tin was mined; mid distance is the lower creek, where the majority came from.)

More telling was Davey’s advice that while the application was for tin, it didn’t include molybdenum or tungsten, two other minerals associated with tin. He considers the application for the rest of the minerals ‘a joke; for a start there are no lithium deposits in the Western Cape.’

Davey continued, ‘This begs the question what was the target selection criteria?’ He further warns that information on the actual prospecting process has yet to be given.

Economically, it makes even less sense. WOSA’s Su Birch initially pointed out that exports have risen from just 50 million litres in 1992 to just over 400 million litres last year, leaving wine the #1 export after cars and metals.

Employing over 275 000 people, the wine industry is one of few sectors to have increased the number of unskilled workers in the past four years. `For every R1 million invested in the wine industry 5.5 jobs are created, while the equivalent figure for mining is only 3.4.’ concluded Conningarth Economists in their macro-economic impact of the wine industry on the South African economy in December 2009. The figure for tourism, now very much allied to the wine industry, is 5.09 jobs for every R1 million invested.

But if anything distresses the farmers, it’s the thought of destroying the environment they’ve put so much effort into preserving. Robert Kopman from Cape Nature emphasised the Bottelary and Tygerberg Hills support the largest areas of renosterveld left;  between and 30 and 40 species ranging from vulnerable to critically endangered are found in these areas. All the farmers whose land is involved have and continue to clear alien vegetation;  eco-tourism in the form of hiking is a popular option on some farms. (The photo taken from Jordan shows Mooiplaas in the near distance, with Tygerberg in the far distance and the dark spots on top small patches of renosterveld.)

Biodviersity and Wine Initiative’s Inge Kotze stresses the importance that the corridor between vineyards and indigenous vegetation be kept open, this break between vineyards helps to control the movement of vineyard pests suh as mealy bug. 

As these small bites of information must indicate, this mining application has many and detrimental implications to hundreds of thousands of people – what I’ve outlined here is just a small part of the story.

Although the deadline to register as an interested party has passed,  it is still important that as many people as possible record their comments. The forms are available on the Jordan website. As Gary Jordan says: ‘Any reason for becoming an interested and affected person is valid, you don’t have to be a land owner to register and simple concerns like, ‘we don’t want to lose our favourite wines’, ‘it will lessen the cape wineland experience’, ‘we don’t want this spoiling our beautiful views’, ‘what about those who will lose their jobs?’, ‘what about the environment and the biodiversity?’, any reason you can think of will assist in this struggle.’

 

Re: Prospects of mining?

Angela, I was being simplistic. 'Developments' in the KZN Midlands look innocent initially, a few friendly 'one on one' chats with the neighbours about a small development "just about 5 houses for the consortium" they say all smiles and handshakes.

Then we discover a notice pinned to a tree advising a public meeting where the Trojan Horse is unveiled, but subtly at first.

Eventually the plans are published and the handful of houses for the chums has turned into an Equestrian Estate with 45 houses in the 'Colonial Vernacular' style (whatever the hell that is), permamnent stabling for 50 nags and competition stabling for 200 nags, swimming pools and tracks for little Gwendoline to trot about on Dobbin until she tires of grooming the smelly brute, not to mention the club house, boutique hotel et al. I have become cynical about the devious way things are done.

So when I read your original piece I immediately thought - an innocent little bit of prospecting today, a golfing estate to-morrow.

Re: Curiouser and curiouser ...

Jancis Robinson has put a free-access link on her site and has written an article regarding this. Click on the link here: http://www.jancisrobinson.com/articles/a201003041.html There is also a link in the article to the two registration forms that need to be filled in regarding objecting to the prospecting. Any valid reason (cultural heritage, job losses, environmental, loss of business if the farms’ production area was disturbed etc) is worth putting down. This cannot just be a protest, otherwise the Department of Minerals and Energy would just discard them. One only has until the 9th March to register.

There is also a facebook site: ‘STOP Mining our Winelands’.

http://www.facebook.com/home.php?sk=lf#!/pages/STOP-Mining-our-Winelands/322229520748?ref=ts

Re: Prospects of mining?

No, Tim, leaving aside the other two comments to this piece, I don't think things are getting out of control and I think you're being a little disingenuous. Given the manner in which those affected have found out what is proposed, for whatever reason, I fully understand the degree of vocal energy behind the response.

Under normal circumstances, you might be correct about the effects of prospecting, but this matter seems to have little of the normal about it and as I write, no details have been given.

If AEM has done its research into the areas' mineral history, it should know that the prospect of finding economic amounts of tin is next to nothing (and 'nothing' when it comes to minerals that don't exist in the area). So why make this application in the first place?

Yes, of course, I know the application is for prospecting rather than mining; I must've been feeling depressed and getting ahead of myself!

Prospects of mining?

I'm wondering if things aren't getting just a little too out of control here! (Nationalise WHAT mine, Peter?) Granted the oddness of it all, I'm not sure how we get from prospecting to where a lot of people are getting. As I understand it, some basic operative facts are that: 1. Prospecting by itself is unlikely to do any harm to anything - fynbos or vines. If they find nothing useful, there will be no mining (if nationalisation of the land were likely, there are far far better motivations than a spurious mine). 2. Landowners do not own mineral rights, true, but any mining could only happen if there were an agreement between those wanting to exploit any minerals and the owner of the land.

That's as I understand it: for any mining to take place it would mean Gary Jordan and David Graaf, etc, reaching some sort of agreement with the miners. (Does anyone know different? I presume that someone involved has done a bit of basic research?) And that agreement presumably won't happen. Angela speaks in her 2nd-last paragraph of a "mining application". It is a prospecting application, not a mining one. Let's get things correct, and then we'll realise that we can probably relax more than we are. Any application to mine would, I think, be a very different matter from an application to prospect. If people are so convinced that the prospecting will reveal nothing useful for a mining company, then they should surely rest assured that its just a waste of time, and the winelands will continue to be as pretty as we like it to be, and the fynbos will be maintained and restored to the extent that landowners want it to be (which in many cases, let's remember, is not very much).

 

Re: Curiouser and curiouser ...

Or just prospect for a couple of months- make it almost a mine dumb and sell it to a developer........with government contracts.

Re: Curiouser and curiouser ...

Nationalise the mine, create a golf estate and give the tender to Julius, par for the course.